Most DNA is not in the form of genes. Fifty to sixty years ago 90% of it appeared to have no known purpose at all and researchers referred to it as "junk DNA" , though they suspected it had an important but yet unknown function. DNA is a huge molecule, very liable to fall apart spontaneously, and requiring constant energy-intensive repair. It seemed ridiculous that the junk DNA had no role to play. Scientists slowly discovered that "junk DNA" had a similar sequence in very many organisms – another indication it must have useful tasks. “God don’t make no junk” as the saying is, and it now seems clear that this very large section of DNA regulates how the genes are expressed in any cell, hence exerting some level of control on genes. In addition to "junk DNA" highly folded sections of DNA also seem to control whether the genes get expressed.
So should we be looking for signatures in the “junk” as well?
The “junk DNA” is very different from genes, and contains an extraordinary number of repeated sequences. About 40% of all DNA is these repetitive sequences. One superfamily of these sequences is called Alu (about 300 bases long), and a family called Alu-Sx is the most common; one sequence from it, which is 11 bases long, occurs a million times in the DNA, while other families like Alu-Jo occur about 400,000 times. They don’t code for proteins however, but for RNA. RNA is a very important relative of DNA that also controls the expression of the genes in the DNA.
However, because this "junk DNA" doesn't directly code for amino acids to make proteins it seemed off to the side of the main task, which was to look at the genetic sequence for possible signatures.Transliteration of non-genetic material into Hebrew as if it was actually producing amino acids and proteins didn't make much sense, so I quickly discarded this approach.
However two names of God showed up: YY ײ (of course), and Most High, על.
Because there is a lot more repetition in junk DNA than in the genetic code itself we could expect these names to show up frequently if we continued with the exercise.